Decolonizing Psychology Globalization Social Justice and Indian Youth Identities Review
Over the summertime, I was very fortunate to travel for the first time to the North Island of New Zealand where I was able to walk among the magnificent Kauri trees, visit the amazing thermal landscapes effectually Rotorua, and capeesh the wonderful rivers, waterfalls and coastlines. What beauty! Enjoying the wonderful scenery and learning about the history of New Zealand (in Māori, Aotearoa) and Māori civilisation reminded me of Linda Tuhiwai Smith'due south (1999) influential text, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples.
The 2nd edition of this volume was published in 2012. For those of us who live in settler countries (Prasad, 2018) such as Commonwealth of australia, New Zealand, Canada and the Us, this volume provides a thought-provoking review of how social science research practices, including qualitative inquiry, have been implicated in imperialism and the colonization and subjugation of ethnic peoples. I found Smith's book compelling when I read it years ago, and yet exercise.
If you want to learn more than about Dr. Smith's work, in that location are several YouTube videos of talks she has given, including:
Dr. Linda T. Smith
Linda T. Smith and Eve Constrict
Linda T. Smith at Simon Fraser University
In the by two decades since the publication of the first edition of Smith'south book, in that location accept been many other texts that talk over decolonizing and indigenous methodologies. These include Bhatia (2018); Chilisa (2012); Denzin, Lincoln, and Smith (2008); Diversi and Moreira (2009); Mutua and Swadener (2004); and Paris and Winn (2014) amid others. Scholars who piece of work with indigenous groups, or who wish to employ decolonizing methodologies in their research practice have a wealth of cloth, along with exemplars to explore (for ii contempo examples, come across Chacaby & Plummer, 2016 in Canada; and NiaNia, Bush, & Epston, 2017 in New Zealand).
In a recent article released online before print in Qualitative Inquiry, Joseph Gone (Forthcoming), who is a "clinically trained, community-engaged research psychologist with faculty appointments in both psychology and Native American Studies" (p. i) explains the misgivings he has virtually indigenous inquiry methodologies (IRM). This give-and-take is situated in the N American context. Gone begins his article by including the text of a talk he gave at the American Indigenous Research Association in 2014. The talk begins by outlining 10 postulates of IRMs. Information technology and so describes three sets of questions about IRMs (including "What is an IE [indigenous epistemology]?" "Who is an Indigenous knower?", and "How should we study, describe, and stand for IEs?") and explains viii misgivings – each posed as questions – that the author has about IRMs (p. 3):
- Participates in untenable ethnoracial and cultural essentialism?
- Emphasizes forms much more than than findings?
- Promises beyond what it delivers in terms of novel insights and answers?
- Insulates inquiry from skeptical interrogation?
- Resituates inquiry every bit identity expression rather than noesis contribution?
- Obscures intellectual debts to "Western" critical theories and approaches?
- Misdirects attention from fabric decolonization?
- Marginalizes existing (simply nonacademic) Indigenous knowledges?
The talk concludes with two "have-habitation" points, which are summed up as follows: (1) it is unlikely that IES are "well-suited for university-based cognition production absent a cracking bargain of repackaging, recasting or reconstruction of these knowledge traditions"; and (two) IRMs adopted by and for Indigenous peoples are all-time characterized as Métis ["mixed", p. 8] forms of enquiry" (p. 3). The newspaper concludes with a response to critiques of the original address that have since been published and a discussion of Gone's thoughts about potential futurity directions for indigenous research methodologies. This commodity, and the debate inside which it is situated, is thought-provoking, and contributes to ongoing discussions of what decolonizing methodologies look like, and how they might be applied to deport research. For anyone interested in learning about contempo debates concerning indigenous enquiry methodologies — this article is a must-read.
Kathy Roulston
P.S. If you are planning to visit New Zealand, some of my favorites include:
- The Kauri Museum in Matakohe, Northland
- A ferry ride in Auckland Harbor
- A trip to the Waipoua Forest to see what is thought to be the largest living Kauri tree in New Zealand, Tāne Mahuta, Lord of the Wood
- A visit to the Auckland State of war Memorial Museum
What are your recommendations for places to visit in New Zealand?
References
Bhatia, S. (2018). Decolonizing psychology: Globalization, social justice, and Indian youth identities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chacaby, M.-due north., & Plummer, M. Fifty. (2016). A 2-spirit journeying: The autobiography of a lesbian Ojibwa-Cree elder. Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press.
Chilisa, B. (2012). Ethnic enquiry methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. Southward., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of disquisitional and indigenous methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.
Diversi, M., & Moreira, C. (2009). Betweener talk: Decolonizing knowledge product, pedagogy, and praxis. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Gone, J. P. (Forthcoming). Because Ethnic Inquiry Methodologies: Critical Reflections by an Indigenous Knower. Qualitative Inquiry, 0(0), 1077800418787545. doi:ten.1177/1077800418787545
Mutua, G., & Swadener, B. B. (Eds.). (2004). Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Printing.
NiaNia, W., Bush, A., & Epston, D. (2017). Collaborative and indigenous mental health therapy: Tātaihono – Stories of Māori healing and psychiatry New York & London: Routledge.
Paris, D., & Winn, M. T. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative enquiry with youth and communities. Los Angeles: Sage.
Prasad, P. (2018). Crafting qualitative research: Beyond positivist traditions (2nd ed.). New York & London: Routledge.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and ethnic peoples. London and New York: Zed Books Limited.
Source: https://qualpage.com/2018/08/02/decolonizing-and-indigenous-methodologies/
0 Response to "Decolonizing Psychology Globalization Social Justice and Indian Youth Identities Review"
Post a Comment